Search for: "United States v. Cunningham" Results 81 - 100 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:34 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The exemption applies only to distributions of (i) a listed security, (ii) a unit consisting of a listed security and a warrant, or (iii) a security convertible into a listed security at the securityholder’s sole discretion. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States held in the case of Voisine v. [read post]