Search for: "United States v. Cunningham" Results 81 - 100 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm by Alyson Carney
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:58 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note: This case was handled by the Arizona FPD.]United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was  unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]