Search for: "United States v. Cunningham" Results 101 - 120 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am by Jessica Smith
Almost two years after the United States Supreme Court decided Miller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:37 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013), require that the jury find facts justifying an increase in either end of the range of the prescribed penalty. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the pilots’ complaints raised only “minor disputes” that were subject to mandatory arbitration under the Railway Labor Act, the court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Cunningham v United Airlines, Inc., February 4, 2014, Holderman, J). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]