Search for: "United States v. Curtis"
Results 1 - 20
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
District Judge Curtis L. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
The most recent development in the fight over ICWA is Brackeen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Nearly all of the interested parties support keeping the settlement in place but the United States government--in its capacity as what Deputy SG Curtis Gannon called its "watchdog" role--objected that the bankruptcy court lacks authority to release third parties like the Sacklers (who did not file for personal bankruptcy) from liability. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Patton State Hospital, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Curtis Pub. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Constitution grants to Congress the power “to borrow money on the credit of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
United States (Halkbank) that may make it easier to prosecute foreign sovereign entities, while leaving some thorny questions of immunities unresolved. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
