Search for: "United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., both companies argued that the United States, not Virginia, had jurisdiction over their claims, because sovereign authority over these territories had passed directly from Great Britain to the United States -- legal arguments that Virginia strenuously resisted. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:39 am by Calvin Massey
  Justice George Sutherland may have overstated the case a bit (but not by much) when he declared in Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation that "in the exercise of the [foreign affairs] power ... the President alone has the power to speak or listen as a representative of the nation. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Curtiss-Wright Export Corp Jonathan Benda, Northeastern University: Formosa Betrayed and Its Fate(s): Rhetorical Ecologies and the Reframing of Human Rights Rhetoric Frank M. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Curtiss-Wright Export Corp Jonathan Benda, Northeastern University: Formosa Betrayed and Its Fate(s): Rhetorical Ecologies and the Reframing of Human Rights Rhetoric Frank M. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am by Harold Hongju Koh
We should not forget that the rule of law problem the United States faces is bigger than Trump. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
The United States has general rights, general powers, and general obligations, not derived from any particular states, nor from all the particular states, taken separately; but resulting from the union of the whole: and, therefore, it is provided, in the fifth article of the confederation, “that for the more convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed to meet in congress. [read post]