Search for: "United States v. Daniel"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Stephen Halbrook] Second Amendment Roundup: Court Seems Disposed to Rule for S&W and Against Mexico
9 Mar 2025, 6:44 pm
Daniel Defense, et al., No. 24-1822 (4th Cir.) [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am
The order requires that the Attorney General “shall take appropriate action to review the activities of all departments and agencies exercising civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States … over the last 4 years. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:15 pm
Attorney Danielle Sassoon). [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am
United States The Trump administration’s fast-moving efforts to limit the size of federal bureaucracy, primarily through the recently minted Department of Government Efficiency, are raising privacy and data security concerns among current and former officials across the government, particularly as the administration scales back positions charged with privacy oversight. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am
He can, among other things, point to: the letter by the former head of the SDNY office, Danielle Sassoon, to Attorney General Pam Bondi alleging facts that Sassoon said were tantamount to a quid pro quo (and her resigning rather than going along with that stratagem); the reported negotiations between Bove and Adams behind the backs of the assigned SDNY prosecutors; Bove’s confiscating the SDNY notes of the meeting where she contends that agreement was discussed (and Bove’s… [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 12:07 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 12:40 pm
In 1898, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 8:24 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that the federal government can't force state and local officials to enforce federal law. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 7:12 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am
” The ECtHR stated that Article 8 did not apply, as “the underlying reasons for the applicant’s dismissal from work were sufficiently linked to his private life. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 4:51 pm
Consider the case of United State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:34 pm
United States and Percoco v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
United States, decided in 2009, the Supreme Court Justices examined this issue in the context of basic databases that local governments maintain to track criminal cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am
The United States this week attempted to push UNICEF and U.N. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Two federal district judges issued opposing rulings after considering challenges to the plan of the United States DOGE Service and others (collectively referred to as DOGE) to access agency systems. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 5:46 am
Wash.) in Friday's Jan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 5:38 am
Ohio) in Sullivan v. [read post]
