Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2025, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguably the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries, opens majestically with these words: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
Vilsack (D.D.C. 2012), a United States District Court for the District of Columbia case, and hold that her obsession with Dr. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 9:07 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
Law v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:10 am
Beck won a case titled United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
If enacted, it would be unlawful for “any person other than a permitted payment stablecoin issuer to issue a payment stablecoin in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 2:26 pm
United States (April 28) – A technical question relating to compensation for veterans. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] SCOTUS Takes A Holiday From The Separation of Powers On The Hampton Dellinger Jitney
22 Feb 2025, 8:44 pm
I realize most people were focused on our arguments about whether Trump was an "Officer of the United States," but the real important contribution was about Griffin's Case. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 3:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 5:05 am
In Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Davis. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
In one of the most interesting and potentially important cases on this Term’s Supreme Court docket, FCC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm
United States, 23-1281Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Prevatte, 346 N.C. 162, 163 (1997), discussed by my colleague, Phil, here (following Davis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:32 pm
Davis, 132 F.3d 1092 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
On this score, Bradley’s critique of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:23 am
United States, No. 2:25-cv-00001; Davis v. [read post]
