Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 2,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Abstract: While the Supreme Court regularly decides cases defining the limits of the criminal jurisdiction of tribal courts, when it heard United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Second Circuit’s decision vacating his conviction was issued on September 20, 2017 (see United States v Brooks, 872 F3d 78, 96 [2d Cir 2017]) and this case was not commenced until September 2021. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
If former President Trump commingled his personal effects with classified documents belonging to the United States, then that is not a reason to allow him to restrict use of the government's property. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I find the start of each academic year invariably invigorating. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm by Haley Proctor
Professor Davis profiled a similar Order No. 1000 challenge—incidentally, also captioned LSP Transmission Holdings II v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]