Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2015, 7:02 am
Last July, we reported on United States v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:02 am
Last July, we reported on United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am
“The judge said the United States government was deceitful, and the government is now deciding whether it wants to proceed with the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am
“The judge said the United States government was deceitful, and the government is now deciding whether it wants to proceed with the case. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
Now the stuff of a bygone era.United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
United States and Dimaya v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court pointed out that the Court of Appeals' discussion was unnecessary speculation.This approach is consistent with the United States Supreme Court's approach in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:54 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
On November 20, 2007, the United States District Judge Michael J. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
The United States Supreme Court Justices will read a brief from one of the youngest lawyers ever to file before the high court. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:55 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
