Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 201 - 220 of 2,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2008, 6:35 am by doyle
Davis Law Review ( – v.39 2006) became, UC Davis Law Review (v.40 2006- ) North Carolina Central Law Journal (v.1 1970 – v.29 2007) became, North Carolina Central Law Review (v.30 2007- ) Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal (v.1 (1966) – v.42 (2008)) became, Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal (v.43 (2008)- ) University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business and Employment Law… [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, 736 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2013), petition filed, No. 13-1124 (March 17, 2014), urges the Supreme Court of the United States to overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
“The judge said the United States government was deceitful, and the government is now deciding whether it wants to proceed with the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
“The judge said the United States government was deceitful, and the government is now deciding whether it wants to proceed with the case. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
Now the stuff of a bygone era.United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court pointed out that the Court of Appeals' discussion was unnecessary speculation.This approach is consistent with the United States Supreme Court's approach in United States v. [read post]
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by Stevie Phillips
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny.  [read post]