Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 301 - 320 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm by Marta Requejo
Contents: Articles THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN UNITED KINGDOM COURTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by Merris Amos STATE LIABILITY FOR JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN EUROPEAN UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Arwel Davies WHY THE FRENCH DON’T LIKE THE BURQA: LAÏCITÉ, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, by Myriam Hunter-Henin THE DUTY TO GIVE REASONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Jarrod Hepburn THE CONTINUING MYTH OF EURO-SCEPTICISM? [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
While your phone’s capabilities are distinctly modern, a new decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
The first section of the UC Davis Guidelines is titled “Operation Business and Financial Plan” emphasizing the importance proper planning and financial support, noting: The failure rate among animal sanctuaries of all types within the United States is known to be very high, with an average lifespan estimated to be around 3 years and a failure rate in excess of 70% for those facilities that do not own the land being utilized for their operation. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:33 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Took up the travel ban case and stayed the orders enjoining its enforcement to the extent they apply to persons with no connection to the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Davis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set up a clash between judges in that district over whether Virginia recognizes the “independent personal stake” exception to the intra-corporate immunity or intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine. [read post]