Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:21 pm
Saul, 19-1442, and Davis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
United States, 20-5758. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
The United States government marched approximately 16,000 Cherokees in September or October from their homelands to Indian Territory. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:14 pm
The rule of State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
” Moreover, even though the United States recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, the United States maintains cultural, commercial and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
She wrote the Court’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Indeed, Harry Crouch, president of the NCFM, announced that the organization was “exploring its options, including filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
EFF, together with Daphne Keller at the Stanford Cyber Law Center, as well as lawyers from Davis Wright Tremaine and Walters Law Group, represent the plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
