Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm
The facts of Fort Bend County v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:04 am
United States, No. 17-8995. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:06 am
Unites States. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
Davis, Civil No. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Treason on Trial: The United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:34 am
The Constitution famously does not say that the federal courts have the power of judicial review; it merely says that the "judicial Power of the United States" shall be vested in the Supreme Court and any inferior courts that Congress might create. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am
In order to proceed in any individual capacity, a shareholder “must allege something more than wrong to the corporate body” (Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
Citing Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States case) is a bit more complicated than might appear at first blush.Let’s start with a simple part: to the extent that the president was asserting that he could seek review of any impeachment proceedings directly in the Supreme Court before any lower court had looked at the matter, his assertion would run smack dab into the most venerable of Supreme Court rulings, the 1803 case of Marbury v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
