Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:57 am
The IRRC Institute and ISS recently announced that they are jointly conducting a study of the state of issuer-investor engagement in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
United States), a “State may constitutionally withdraw the authority of state officers to enforce federal law. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm
” Unlike the Davis trial, Texas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:56 am
’ Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
