Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:56 am
’ Davis v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm
” Unlike the Davis trial, Texas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:02 am
Kerry Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawJosé E. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit grants rehearing en banc to reconsider the amount of restitution that a district court may order a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography to pay to children depicted in the images: Today, the Fifth Circuit posted online this order issued Wednesday granting rehearing en banc in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:57 pm
Renhcol Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:27 pm
United States on Monday. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004) [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Davis SC18864 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
Washington (2004) and Davis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
