Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 681 - 700 of 3,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ethan Yan
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am by Will Baude
But that’s what happened in the Second Circuit’s decision Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Miriam Baer
Justice Alito may have been in the minority in the JDB case, but he wrote the majority opinion for the Court in Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:57 am by David Lynn
The IRRC Institute and ISS recently announced that they are jointly conducting a study of the state of issuer-investor engagement in the United States. [read post]
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by Karen Gullo
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and   Contact:  DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]