Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 2,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And as Buckley points out, the case that presented the greatest challenge in this regard was Confederate President Jefferson Davis’s treason prosecution.The Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
We can also consider more contemporary lower court decisions adjudicating challenges to laws discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.One important theme running through this precedent employs a recurring set of criteria (tracing back to the famous Footnote 4 of the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Its members account for approximately 55-60% of total olive oil sales in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am by jlucivero
Davis – a challenge to the introduction of explicitly racially biased evidence in a Texas death penalty case – in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece on misinformation and how roughly one third of social media users across the United States, as well as Argentina, Germany, South Korea, Spain and United Kingdom, reported seeing false or misleading information about coronavirus. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Facebook Inc v Davis No.17-17486, the Ninth Circuit has found the Facebook tracking of users’ browsing habits, even when they were not logged into the service, may have violated Californian privacy law. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]