Search for: "United States v. Dawson" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am by Victoria Clark
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
 The other two — Mitchell and Dawson counties — are in the oil-rich Permian Basin. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by Brad Pauley
Cloverleaf Creamery Co. (1981) 449 U.S. 456, 464, 101 S.Ct. 715, 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (Minnesota), citing United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, as part of the lasting legacy of Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
As part of its investigation, the United States served a search warrant on Carpathia. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:35 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McCarthy v R [2015] EWCA Crim 1185 (09 July 2015) Lane, R v [2015] EWCA Crim 1226 (08 July 2015) Avorgah v R [2015] EWCA Crim 1186 (07 July 2015) Smith, R v [2015] EWCA Crim 1123 (26 June 2015) Nicholles, R v [2015] EWCA Crim 1174 (17 June 2015) Chalk & Ors v R [2015] EWCA Crim 1053 (17 June 2015)   Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Obrascon Huarte Lain SA v HM Attorney General for Gibraltar… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:30 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaActress Katie Holmes, 32, whose five-year marriage to actor Tom Cruise--Hollywood's most famous Scientologist--has been fodder for supermarket tabloids, has filed a $50 million defamation suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Star Magazine's parent company, American Media, Inc., whose stable of publications also includes The National Inquirer.The nine-page Complaint, Katie Holmes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
 We have had over 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Malaysia and India making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360, Edward Zelinsky writes that the justices’ comments during oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]