Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 38,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
” Yet in 1974’s United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Michael Dreeben argues for the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:48 am
Health Insurance Alliance (“HIA”), a judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois issued a useful decision for defendants, dismissing Plaintiff’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In FBI v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm
” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the St. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
In 2020, the district court ruled that the city’s homelessness-related ordinances were unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
The justices heard two cases in the 2023-2024 term involving guns: United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
.), and only DIFs that were “imposed neither generally nor ministerially, but on an individual and discretionary basis” could invoke the Takings Clause embedded in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.[2] This limitation on developers’ ability to utilize the Takings Clause meant that courts would not apply the “Nollan/Dolan test” to DIFs generally applicable to a broad class of property owners pursuant to legislative… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
” The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint, concluding that the plaintiff-shareholders did not “actually plead an uncertainty that should have been disclosed” under Item 303 (i.e., there was no predicate Item 303 violation). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
