Search for: "United States v. Dixon" Results 41 - 60 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:07 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
 In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
And as Judge Dixon is now finding out, that representation by ECUSA's attorneys was wrong.According to the papers filed by Mark Lawrence's attorneys with Judge Dixon, not a single plaintiff parish ever signed a document stating that they expressly agreed to the trust which the Dennis Canon attempted to impose. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:05 am by Steven Cohen
DixonUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit – August 1st, 2019) involves a fire at a hotel. [read post]