Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 33,851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 1:52 am by Kurt R. Karst
  The FDA simply relies on the vague statement that courts can “restrain violations” of the FDC Act to support its demand for disgorgement and/or restitution:  “The district courts of the United States and the United States courts of the Territories shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown to restrain violations of section 301 . . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:51 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, both liberal and conservative justices indicated the real limits on that delegation of power. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The federal judge presumably does not need the state court’s help in expounding federal constitutional law. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
In general, courts evaluate the validity of a law that regulates expressive conduct under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Viviano also indicated that in an appropriate future case, he would consider adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States (2019) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting). [5.] [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Regardless, the United States Supreme Court has rejected such an interest as an adequate reason to impose a prior restraint. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Husband, a dual citizen of Lebanon and the United States, has resided in the United States for over 30 years, but often travels to Lebanon to vacation and visit family members…. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Barrett was a member of a panel affirming by unpublished opinion an appeal brought by a Native prisoner in Wisconsin state prison, Schlemm v Carr. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:30 am by Matthew Tokson
Under the reasonable expectation of privacy test of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am by Simon Lester
The authors of this post, academics and practitioners specialising in EU competition, state aid, public procurement and trade law, responded to the consultation. [read post]
Notably, the proposed rule states that the “integrated unit of production” factor differs “from the concept of the importance or centrality of the individual’s work to the potential employer’s business. [read post]