Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 33,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2020, 10:34 am by Kate Klonick
But what does Section 230 actually say? [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Laws that reflect Christian moral views on contested issues is yet another of the privilege that Christians have long enjoyed in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:19 am by Rob Cashman (CashmanLawFirm.com)
Rightscorp seemed to be in such a powerful position, especially after the BMG v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On December 6, 2011, 261 East 78 Realty Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (id., ¶ 27). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
While I’m starting with the United States Copyright Act for reasons explained in an earlier column, such reform will work only if they work everywhere. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Some have discounted the anti-Semitic remarks of Nick Cannon and, shortly before that, from Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver DeSean Jackson as taking attention away from Black Lives Matter and efforts to address racial injustice in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The charges relate to alleged bid-rigging and price-fixing for broiler chicken products sold in the United States between 2012 and 2017. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
” That said, pursuant to the CJEU’s decision, organizations can no longer rely on the Privacy Shield framework to cover transfers of EU personal data to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
Walzer’s “character” does not necessarily mean a narrow focus on culture, and the theorist acknowledges that a state has a duty to admit refugees at risk of harm elsewhere. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by Christian Schröder
This obligation does not only apply to data transfers into the United States but to all countries located outside the European Union. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:28 pm by Christian Schröder
This obligation does not only apply to data transfers into the United States but to all countries located outside the European Union. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1970), where the property owner raised a similar argument in response to the Corps of Engineers' district court lawsuit under the Rivers and Harbors Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am by Rob Robinson
Schrems claims that the United States does not offer sufficient protection of data transferred to that country. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
Following the outcome of Schrems I, Schrems reformulated his complaint to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) about data transfers arguing that the United States does not provide adequate protection as United States law requires Facebook Inc. to make the personal data transferred to it available to certain United States authorities, such as the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and… [read post]