Search for: "United States v. Donato"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a trial starting November 6. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 1:34 am
Yesterday (Friday, March 31) the DOJ filed its reply brief in support of its motion for sanctions: United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:29 am
Google's counterproposal is October 23, arguing that the plaintiffs' proposal "will likely conflict with the trial in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Nov. 18, 2022), the Honorable James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss claims brought against defendants Coca-Cola, Blue Triton Brands, and Niagara Bottling (collectively the “Defendants”) by plaintiff individuals and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”). [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:12 am
"Should Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California considered that Rule 37(e)(2)(B) remedy overreaching, the plaintiffs at least want a Rule 37(e)(1) "curative jury instruction. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Near-simultaneously with Epic's motion for a temporary restraining order (which Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California didn't have to rule on as Google backed down, thereby mooting the motion for the time being), Match Group also brought an antitrust complaint against Google in the same district and sought emergency relief. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
