Search for: "United States v. Duggan" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
K 3258 S88 2012 Models of religious freedom : Switzerland, the United States, and Syria by analytical, methodological, and eclectic representation. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
KF 1609 K75 2012 International trade law and domestic policy : Canada, the United States, and the WTO / Jacqueline D. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:16 am by Sean Minahan
United States, Dow Chemical sued the United States after the EPA took aerial photographs of Dow’s chemical plant in Midland, Michigan. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
It concerned reports of the shooting of Mark Duggan in August 2011. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
The authors are principally British and Canadian with two from the United States (one of whom used to teach at a Canadian law school), two from Singapore, two from Australia and one from Israel. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
In the complaint, Duggan Family Partnership alleged that pollutants from the city’s wastewater treatment plant have contaminated water on the plantation, the Ocmulgee River, Palmetto Creek and Turkey Creek, according to the suit, filed in federal court June 8, 2009. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 12:56 am
United States, 37 U.S. 488, 492 (1838). [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Codell     Eastern District of Kentucky at Frankfort DUGGAN, District Judge. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]