Search for: "United States v. Edmonds"
Results 141 - 160
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2009, 10:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
It distinguished all the other roadblock cases, including United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The "statement of counsel" signed by John Whealan states:Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Telephone Cases 126 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
It further requires that “[t]he tabulation of total population by States … as required for the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States shall be completed within 9 months after the census date and reported by the Secretary to the President of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:57 am
United States, 362 U.S. 217, 226 (1960); United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 8:11 pm
Olson and Edmond v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
Since that decision, Baze v. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 9:24 am
Goldsmith; United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989).United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 12:40 am
" United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006), the United States Supreme Court held that: [P]arolees are on the "continuum" of state-imposed punishments. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 8:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 pm
" (citing United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
III, §2, cl. 1; see, e.g., Edmonds v. [read post]
