Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 1 - 20 of 2,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
During his tirade, plaintiff got aggressive and lunged toward the Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am by Richard Hunt
Noble Homes relied on an earlier equally important case, The Sec’y, United States Dep’t of Hous. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
United States, a case that would have answered the question of whether emergency room doctors in Idaho can perform abortions as health stabilizing measures. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted Moral Reality as a Guide to Original Meaning: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Section 271(e)(1) states that it “shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]