Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 221 - 240 of 2,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Wendy McGuire Coats
From: Judges Gould, Bybee, Callahan & Bea On September 20, 2010, Circuit Judge Gould joined by Circuit Judges Bybee, Callahan, and Bea issued an order dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Lee, a director since 1994, is also a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, The Procter & Gamble Company and The DIRECTV Group, Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Public policy and arbitration awards Correctional Officers PBA v State, 94 NY2d 321 Edward Kuhnel, a State correctional officer, was suspended from duty and served with disciplinary charges after the Department of Correctional Services learned that he flew a Nazi flag from the front porch of his home on December 10, 1996 -- the 55th anniversary of Hitler's declaration of war on the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LERNER,No. 08-4991-cv;UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Edward McNallay spotted a new Delaware Chancery Court case dealing with insider trading by corporate officers: Pfeiffer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
United States, concerning the treaty power. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (1983) and Edwards v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
United States Department of Defense (11-cv-00890), United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg rejected a Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552 et seq.] request by conservative watchdog Judicial Watchdog, Inc. to release 52 images concerning the death and burial of bin Laden on the grounds that the depictions were inflammatory and posed a national security risk, (See "TUOL" posts 4/27/12, 1/30/12.)The group made its case… [read post]