Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 61 - 80 of 1,704
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Randolph J. May
United States, the nondelegation doctrine is “not an element readily enforceable by the courts. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
A federal court has ruled that the United States is entitled to more than $5.2m from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s book royalties, according to the US Department of Justice. [read post]
 Because the balance in the fund is now below $100 million, the fund’s administrator is required by law to levy a solvency tax on employers.[2] On September 24, 2020, Governor Edwards issued an executive order suspending the sections of Louisiana law that require the additional solvency tax through October 9, 2020.[3]  In a letter to the Senate President and Speaker of the House dated September 25, 2020, Governor Edwards also requested that the Louisiana Legislature… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
He had learned that many demographers thought whites would eventually become a minority race in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am by Florian Mueller
Their first joint complaint was dismissed by Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, but without prejudice, and the plaintiffs brought an amended complaint. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:27 am by Amy L. Peck and Michael H. Neifach
” The purpose of the wind down period was to give the beneficiaries some time to prepare to leave the country or seek some other status in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Bayer, in which Section 43(a) was read to provide a cause of action to a plaintiff whose pleaded trademark had never been used in the United States). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]