Search for: "United States v. Eldred" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
/Apr. 2004] concerning the outcome of Eldred v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media,, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Eldred was not imprisoned for the status of being an addict, which would have been unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment according to the United States Supreme Court case, Robinson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm by Marty Lederman
I suspect it never enjoyed a United States copyright--which makes it an even more apt hypothetical in the context of Golan.] [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Terry Hart
The provisions restored copyright in any work that had fallen into the public domain in the US “for the remainder of the term of copyright that the work would have otherwise been granted in the United States if the work never entered the public domain in the United States.” [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In Founding-Era Translations of the United States Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn analyze how these translations might aid interpretation of the Constitution today.Of greatest interest to readers of this blog is likely the Progress Clause:English: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries . . . .German: Die… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
The Public Domain in the United States just got smaller.In this Kat’s opinion, SCOTUS (The Supreme Court of the United States) picked quite an interesting time to release its opinion in Golan v. [read post]