Search for: "United States v. Elliott"
Results 41 - 60
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:12 am
This does not imply, however, that a sentence of 21 months is unreasonably high; to the contrary, it strikes us as unreasonably low, and United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Cathedral kept its Catholic status by firing Payne-Elliott. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jason Elliott v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:39 am
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 869 (Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
National Bank of Missouri, 18 Wall. 409, 410; Elliott v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
As a result, and as was the case in Elliott v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm
The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Thus, in Elliott Associates v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
United States, 197 U.S. 207; Bailey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:52 pm
Celebrating 30 years of Biotechnology Innovation: From Diamond v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm
Sapp v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has adopted a three step approach to aid courts in determining whether an activity constitutes “work” for purposes of the FLSA. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison represents the Defendant-Appellee, Guy Elliott, and Kannon Shanmugam argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on behalf of Guy Elliott on May 19, 2022. [2] — F.4th –, 2022 WL 2760323, *1 (2d Cir. 2022). [3] 139 S. [read post]
