Search for: "United States v. Ellison" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 9:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The opinion in this case was issued on January 11, 2011, by Judge Keith Ellison, out of the United States District Court, Southern District Texas, Houston Division. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:19 pm
A year and a day after the suit was removed to federal court, Judge Ellison of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas has dismissed the main chunk of Roger Clemens' defamation action against former trainer Brian McNamee. [read post]
In an order dated January 11, Hennepin County District Court Judge Peter Cahill ruled that the first trial, State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
Listing seven criticisms of the government’s handling of the questioning, Judge Ellison said: “Stated simply, no one acting in the name of the United States should ever engage in such conduct – deceptive at best, and also seriously coercive. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:14 pm by Kurt R. Karst
” The issue of whether this “second violation” felony requires evidence of intent was addressed in a recent Ninth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
With great clarity and insight, he offers a new lens through which to understand the history of civil rights in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:29 pm by Anders Walker
  Just came across a letter by Ralph Ellison responding to William Faulkner's defense of a moderate, gradualist approach to Brown v. [read post]