Search for: "United States v. Emory" Results 21 - 40 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
The United States for the Eleventh Circuit rejected this use of a statistical study without evidence that racism played a role in the specific case under review. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am by webmaster
  Moreover, the Rutgers/Emory study’s findings stand in contrast to apparent misgivings on the part the United States Supreme Court’s conservative bloc about the social utility of class actions, exemplified in recent decisions such as Concepcion v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:43 am by Martin George
Peter Hay (Emory Univ. - Law), Lajos Vékás (ELTE - Law), Yehuda Elkana (Central European Univ.), & Nenad Dimitrijevic (Central European Univ. - Political Science) have published Resolving International Conflicts: Liber Amicorum Tibor Várady (Central European Univ. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
Here’s a link to the actual brief, written by the Emory Law School Supreme Court Advocacy Project. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at paras. 135-140, as a procedural immunity, in an error acknowledged by the Court in Z and Others v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Part IV touches on the deprecated place of religious freedom in the drafting of the 1787 United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by Christine Corcos
Part IV touches on the deprecated place of religious freedom in the drafting of the 1787 United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:47 pm by legalinformatics
Here is a summary of the article: In the 1950s and 1960s, the southern [United] states struggled to respond to the civil rights decisions being issued by the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]