Search for: "United States v. Erie R. Co" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
United States Mineral Products Co., 898 A.2d 590, 600 (Pa. 2006), "there is no strict liability in Pennsylvania relative to non-intended uses even where foreseeable by the manufacturer." [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
Neither this Court nor the motion court is " required to shut its eyes to the patent falsity of a defense' " (id., quoting MRI Broadway Rental v United States Min. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In so ruling ,the Superior Court followed the reasoning of the united States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied State Farm’s Motion In Limine to bifurcate a breach of contract and bad faith post-Koken lawsuit.).STATE COURT DECISIONS ON BIFURCATIONState Appellate Court DecisionStepanovich v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mitchell of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kapton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
Cardozo’s majority opinions in Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Texas, Fort Worth Division.May 16, 2017.FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEHAL R. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am by Ken White
Through something called the Erie doctrine, named after a 1938 case called Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]