Search for: "United States v. Estate of Grace" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 3:58 am by Harry Styron
In 1963, a unanimous decision of the United Supreme Court, Gideon v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
The estate of Grace Chow is now fully administered. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm by Bill Ward
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
June 20, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the Trustee of Bernard L. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:00 am by Charlotte McGee
While the Alberta Court of Appeal in Re: Foote Estate stated that the domicile of the Deceased “determines the applicable law for estate administration purposes” – suggesting that it is the testator’s domicile that determines which jurisdiction’s laws are to govern the administration of an estate – the  Ontario Court in Tyrell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
"A pardon is an act of grace," wrote John Marshall in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Several months after the patent had lapsed, Shore-Sirotin learned from Honig that the patent was licensed, and immediately sent an e-mail dated March 19, 2002, referencing the patent and its United Kingdom analogue, to Pat Tormey, an Abelman legal assistant, stating, "[P]lease do NOT DROP these patents in the U.S ... [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Our friend Joe Hollingsworth called our attention to an example of the latter in the Aredia/Zometa MDL, which has already been so prolific in producing grist for our bloggy mill.The United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas granted Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion to dismiss in McDaniel v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
But those are just statutory exemptions, created as a matter of legislative grace. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]