Search for: "United States v. Feingold"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 1:18 pm
United States (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 68, 2022) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
United States in 2006, greatly reduced the scope of the CWA, undermining decades of clean water protections. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
In the Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
It has now taken the Court longer to address the one as-applied challenge in Citizens United than it did to address the slew of challenges to the McCain-Feingold law back in 2003 (McConnell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:55 am
Love it or hate it, Citizens United is here to stay, and it just knocked down a campaign finance law in New York.The case is New York Progress and Protection PAC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
First, there is an interesting discussion of the history of the corporate form in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:47 am
Tags: campaign regulation, First Amendment, Supreme Court Related posts State of the Union: Lip-reading Justice Alito (21) November 18 roundup (3) Yet more Edwards campaign-cash laundering (0) Yes, I’m being facetious (16) Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
In January 2010, the court ruled 5-4 in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
Republicans v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Federal Election Committee (558 U.S. 310) was decided by the United States Supreme Court.Facts of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Elena Kagan is the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is an opinion piece on the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
However, Citizens United began as a challenge by a non-profit regarding a pay-per-view movie; until the Court ordered re-hearing, the broader challenge to McConnell, Austin, or the McCain-Feingold Act was not before it. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:04 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
The briefs are flooding in for the Citizens United case, where the Supreme Court unexpectedly ended the Term not by issuing a decision, but by ordering the parties to submit additional briefs on whether the Court should overrule Austin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
The 2012 election will be our first presidential election since the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
