Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[7]  By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm by centerforartlaw
However, this article will focus on intellectual property protection within the United States and provide an outline of what can and cannot be protected. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:16 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am by centerforartlaw
I needed to prepare to work on the first case of a foreign country suing in the United States to recover cultural property. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
(“Quickway”), through its affiliates, has terminals with trucking operations throughout the United States, including a terminal in Louisville, Kentucky that only provided services for a national grocery chain. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]