Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
A Short History of State RFRAs The first, federal RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, was passed by Congress to trump the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
However, today’s reality presents a very different picture. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Lofgren took issue especially with Pallante’s remark during the interview that “Copyright is for the author first and the nation second. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
We’d be alarmed, for example, if the chairman of the FCC said the Telecommunications Act was for the telecom companies first and the nation second, and it’s not clear to me how your statement, if it was accurately reported, is any different. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
Costs and Statistics There is no clear picture of the actual amount of money laundered globally. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm by Greg Mersol
   However, in 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rendered its decision in UAW v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    In the following guest post, Jonathan Joseph (pictured to the left) takes a look at the extent to officers may defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule in cases to which California law applies. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Ken
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" []) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]