Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., 791 F.3d 376 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am by Kathy Kreps
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 And the objecting employer is cut out of the picture altogether. [read post]
If pursued, the DOJ’s probe could be the biggest antitrust hit taken by the movie theater industry since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
EFF filed an amicus brief in the case backing Twitter on behalf of two unnamed companies fighting the NSL gag provisions—a case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit right now. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal combined… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Like the projectors in Motion Picture Patents, goods can travel through many hands downstream from the first authorized acquirer of title to the good. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
First, the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 Or the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences who staged the event? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
This is the proper core of Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch), a First of December ruling by Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales that Jeremy reports in this post.* Badly behaved politicians, Parliamentary Pirates and a point of copyright principleAmelia Andersdotter, a Swedish politician and former Swedish Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament, drops… [read post]