Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once the concept of law is understood, it becomes easier to place law within the institutional structures in which it is created, and applied--the state and its apparatus, the ordering of law in hierarchies of authority, the relationship between national and international law, and the constraining principle of rule of law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., 11 Civ 6784 (WHP) United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
’ The document further stated, `You are an immigrant not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other valid entry document required by the Immigration and Nationality Act’, and `It is likely that you have engaged or will engage in unauthorized employment in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
The court found against Leopold, stating that books, magazines, and motion pictures are forms of public expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
A Short History of State RFRAs The first, federal RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, was passed by Congress to trump the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
However, today’s reality presents a very different picture. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Costs and Statistics There is no clear picture of the actual amount of money laundered globally. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
In National Association of the Deaf v Netflix, Inc., C.A. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
In the following guest post, Jonathan Joseph (pictured to the left) takes a look at the extent to officers may defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule in cases to which California law applies. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
