Search for: "United States v. Flores"
Results 241 - 260
of 546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Although RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments in the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Use of the drug took place in a military context: everyone in the decedent’s unit took an antimalarial drug before shipping to Afghanistan. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Flores. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:28 am
Burmese officials arrested him in January 2011 and returned him to United States custody. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
And when conflict is unavoidable, we should not come to do battle with the United States Congress armed only with a test (congruence and proportionality) that has no demonstrable basis in the text of the Constitution and cannot objectively be shown to have been met or failed. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
The Flores court correctly noted that, “since Fisher, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion has altered the legal landscape substantially. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 4:34 am
McCarthy, two officers in the drug control unit of the Boston police department, were conducting a drug investigation in the Orient Heights neighborhood of the East Boston section of Boston. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
Subsequent to the Kagenveama decision, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision that complicated things. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
Flores (1997). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
Flores formulation, to the harm Congress was addressing). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Especially when, as here, they're time-sensitive matters in which delay constitutes a substantial downside itself.It's even worse in this particular case, because the Ninth Circuit ends up doing exactly what the United States asked it to do over three years ago when it filed a motion to remand the case to the BIA. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
In Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 35, 43; Flores v. [read post]
