Search for: "United States v. Flores"
Results 61 - 80
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Under court decisions interpreting the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
Flores v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security modified the Flores Settlement, which provides protective standards for detaining children in detention centers. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:30 pm
MARCH Ramos v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
An informant reported to a drug unit officer that he had twice bought $100 worth of marijuana from the plaintiff. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
The court was deferential in Flores, upholding a federal rule that provided for government custody of UACs who could not be released to a parent, legal guardian or other close adult relative in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:43 pm
For his part, the President has defended the proposal stating that he has the best interest of the children in mind given that undocumented families will be discouraged from traveling to the United States with the passage of this rule. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 1:34 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:28 am
Flores v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
He came to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1962 . . . . [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
(antitrust) and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:22 pm
In the 2012 case of United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
Chief Justice Morrison Waite In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
