Search for: "United States v. Flores" Results 81 - 100 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by Evan Lee
Both the state of Idaho and the United States, as amicus curiae, had argued that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel analysis should be different when the defendant has waived appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am by SHG
E.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am by Evan Lee
” Kavanaugh renewed his query about practicality during the argument of Allon Kedem, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Idaho. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Bethany Berger
Flores, and a requirement to notify the state before transporting “unstamped” cigarettes (i.e., those without the stamps to indicate whether state taxes had been paid), in 2007’s United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
If the proposed rule is enforced, it will replace the Flores Settlement Agreement reached in 2001 in response to the class-action lawsuit Flores v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm by Jeff Welty
United States: “Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the ‘separate sovereigns’ exception to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first of three installments of draft guidance intended to protect against “potential attacks” on the United States’ food supply. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]