Search for: "United States v. Flores"
Results 81 - 100
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2019, 12:52 pm
The Florida Supreme Court decided that the fee limiting statute was unconstitutional under both Florida’s Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Both the state of Idaho and the United States, as amicus curiae, had argued that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel analysis should be different when the defendant has waived appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 5:26 am
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is now reviewing a case that stems from this very issue. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
” Kavanaugh renewed his query about practicality during the argument of Allon Kedem, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Idaho. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am
Flores, and a requirement to notify the state before transporting “unstamped” cigarettes (i.e., those without the stamps to indicate whether state taxes had been paid), in 2007’s United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:57 pm
If the proposed rule is enforced, it will replace the Flores Settlement Agreement reached in 2001 in response to the class-action lawsuit Flores v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm
United States: “Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the ‘separate sovereigns’ exception to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
Flores v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:39 pm
In 1993, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari/appellate review in the landmark case of Flores v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first of three installments of draft guidance intended to protect against “potential attacks” on the United States’ food supply. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Garrett, 2000’s United States v. [read post]
