Search for: "United States v. Flores" Results 101 - 120 of 546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm by FM Librarian
"Detention of Child Asylum Seekers in the Pursuit of State Interests: A Comparison of the Australian and EU Approaches," Nordic Journal of Human Rights, vol. 36, no. 1 (2018) [abstract]DG Swing Asks Libya Not to Send Rescued Migrants Back to Detention (IOM, July 2018) [text]Domestic and International Standards and the Immigration and Refugee Board's Guideline on Detention (UNHCR, Feb. 2018) [text]"Immigration Detention: An Anglo Model," Migration Studies, Advance… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first of three installments of draft guidance intended to protect against “potential attacks” on the United States’ food supply. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm by Victoria Clark
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Matthew Kolken
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 4:42 pm by Steve Kalar
  No worries, from the Feds (unless, of course, you’re an alien).United States v. [read post]