Search for: "United States v. Florida Power & Light Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
While our labor movement tends to support a powerful regulatory state, this impulse is familiar to them. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The power to do this is not, however, limited to extreme examples (such as a real-world theocracy that happens not to be based on the favored religion in the United States). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
United States Forest Service v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
At the same time, “[w]hile the Mercedes itself is not within the United States, that alone does not defeat the court’s ability to obtain jurisdiction over it. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:03 am
Lumbermens appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which ultimately affirmed the District Court’s finding of coverage. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
Netchoice (Florida) and Netchoice v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
To unite the country. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 8:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:05 am
Missouri Power and Light Co., 517 S.W. 2d 110 (Mo. 1974); USX Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:05 am
Missouri Power and Light Co., 517 S.W. 2d 110 (Mo. 1974); USX Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
------- Title: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Standard Forex (E.D.N.Y. 1995), and to waive attorney-client and work product protection over the objection of a former corporation officer facing criminal charges, United States v. [read post]
