Search for: "United States v. Fore" Results 101 - 120 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Firstly, a judgment will be issued this Thursday on kettling (Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom; a brief history of the case can be found here) by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organized crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behavior, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus has it been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:48 pm by Dan
And just to be clear, "in China," for purposes of China's trademark law, does not mean in Hong Kong or in Taiwan or in Macau or in the United States or in Australia or in any other country. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm by Ken Lammers
The BIG FUSS this week has been about United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
They don't have the power to make any deals on behalf of the United States Attorney, and they usually aren't concerned with your best interests. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am by Jasmine Joseph
Quon, the United States Supreme Court considered both of these questions. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
"The Court was also careful to state that its conclusion in the case said nothing of whether the words HAVANA CLUB are eligible fore registration as a trade mark. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]