Search for: "United States v. Freed" Results 21 - 40 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — how a federal appeals court should treat an error by the trial judge in imposing the wrong sentence range under the federal Sentencing Guidelines Duncan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am by Nicholas Mosvick
Just a year before Prigg in 1841, Story penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 2:58 am
Brown, Judge Calabresi opens his decision as follows:"Eighty-four years ago, Judge Learned Hand observed that '[o]ur procedure has been always haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted,' but posited, optimistically, that '[i]t is an unreal dream.' United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:24 am by Robert Chesney
Thus he cannot be removed from the United States if he wants to stay once he is here, nor can he be be barred from entering the United States if and when he is freed overseas and can find a way to get here. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]