Search for: "United States v. Freeman" Results 201 - 220 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Serving as Chief Justice of the United States was Duke Law School Dean, and former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:20 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On October 7, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the imposition of fees and costs against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
Back on June 28, 2012, Stockton filed a petition seeking to adjust its debts under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley Federal Law United States Supreme Court Freeman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Pursuant to protocol -- five police units already were on the scene -- she “just stayed off” from the house. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Travis Casey
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by christopher
Freeman, 872 F.2d 907, 910-11 (9th Cir. 1989). [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am by Brandon Storm
  Recall that the Obama Administration refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In his infamous January 2 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Trump referred to Ruby Freeman by name: “She’s a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler Ruby Freeman. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm by Ken White
Here's how the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — hardly a bastion of liberalism — recently summarized it: Similar to the reasoning we set forth for employer liability for co-worker harassment, “an employer cannot avoid Title VII liability for [third-party] harassment by adopting a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ strategy.' “ Ocheltree v. [read post]