Search for: "United States v. Freeman" Results 301 - 320 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 8:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, but this time Justice Kennedy joined the four liberal justices to hold that criminal defendants who enter into plea agreements can benefit from retroactive changes to the sentencing guidelines.In CSX Transportation v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:02 pm by Lawrence Solum
Specifically, this note analyzes three different cases from three different fields of law decided by U.S. courts that illustrate this problem: United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am by thejaghunter
  Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen,… [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
  The Court invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in three cases: Freeman v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States — which was heavily relied on by the Ninth Circuit decision invalidating the Stolen Valor Act — stated that speech is fully protected (though that protection might be overcome under strict scrutiny) unless it fits within historically established First Amendment exceptions. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by jamison
United States, ___ A.2d ___ (D.C. 2011), a D.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]