Search for: "United States v. GTE Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
 Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to… [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Unimin Corp., 319 F.3d 350 (8th Cir. 2003) (Iowa law); Haase v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
GTE Valeron Corp., 800 F.2d 1101, 1110 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102, 108 (1980).(..)See United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]