Search for: "United States v. Gallant" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 7:00 pm by Donna Gallant
By Donna Gallant When the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (San Francisco) affirmed an order certifying the largest employment discrimination class action ever in the United States, Wal-Mart was left facing a class of up to 1.5 million members. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple--will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday, October 21, 2022. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:06 pm
§ 1325(a)(B)(ii) entitling the creditor to interest pursuant to the Supreme Court's prior opinion in Till v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
According to estimates published in a joint statement by the United States, Korea, and Japan, the North Korean regime “stole up to $1.7 billion in cryptocurrency in 2022 alone. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:19 am by Laura (Program Assistant)
Maciej Lipinski A recent ruling in the United States has repercussions for a woman seeking refugee status in Canada. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Gallante Romar Phillips v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:16 am by Russell Knight
In [the] Nixon [case], the [United States] Supreme Court stated that ‘[e]very court has supervisory power over its own records and files, and access [may be] denied where court files might[ ] become a vehicle for improper purposes. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:44 am
[See IPBiz post Gettysburg and KSR v. [read post]