Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 1 - 20 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
On May 23, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by lpbncontracts
[This is a continuation of yesterday's post about oral argument in the consolidated cases of General Dynamics and Boeing. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
  On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent, General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd (“General Dynamics”), seeks to enforce an arbitration award of over £16 million plus interest and costs (“the Award”) made in 2016 by an International Chamber of Commerce arbitral tribunal against the appellant, the State of Libya (“Libya”). [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:56 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in General Dynamics Corp v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:22 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Supreme Court today unanimously ruled in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:26 pm
United States [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] and The Boeing Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Elena Kagan is the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:40 am by Steven Boutwell
GSF Development Driller I, et al., 587 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2009), the United States Fifth Circuit reiterated the longstanding rule that generally, a seaman belonging to a vessel in peril cannot claim a salvage compensation for saving his vessel. [read post]