Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics"
Results 221 - 240
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
If family court in the United States “protects” our children in divorce, who protects our children from the family court? [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
The court held that the AI-generated work is protectable by copyright law since it is as a work of legal entities.Eleonora Rosati discussed the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Response Clothing Ltd v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd case. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am
Some, most notably those who are either law nerds or untroubled by the substance, will raise the shock that a draft opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States was leaked to Politico. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
In other words, the Court faces a secondary question in its ATS analysis: does it wish to limit just federal ATS cases or does it wish to limit transnational human rights litigation in the United States generally where there is a limited nexus with the United States? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:15 pm
Progressive Dynamics, Inc., 194 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:59 pm
The exception has long been understood by some parties, including the United States, to be “self-judging,” meaning that the state invoking the exception has the exclusive competence to decide whether the exception applies. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:23 am
The buildings were valuable and General Dynamics stepped in and bought the complex for its submarine division. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:37 pm
The United States has, over the last generation, served as the great focal point for efforts to domesticate international law norms, rules and principles. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
We commented on a similar dynamic under Federal Rule 21 here.California. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
