Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 241 - 260 of 1,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by Donald Childress
  In other words, the Court faces a secondary question in its ATS analysis:  does it wish to limit just federal ATS cases or does it wish to limit transnational human rights litigation in the United States generally where there is a limited nexus with the United States? [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  But this valve of healthy constitutional democracies is not discussed or theorized enough in the United States, for obvious practical reasons. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:59 pm by Simon Lester
The exception has long been understood by some parties, including the United States, to be “self-judging,” meaning that the state invoking the exception has the exclusive competence to decide whether the exception applies. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:23 am by Doug Cornelius
The buildings were valuable and General Dynamics stepped in and bought the complex for its submarine division. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
  We commented on a similar dynamic under Federal Rule 21 here.California. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by David Pozen
”  Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there…  The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by David Pozen
”  Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there…  The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
The details of the complaint remain vague, but Schiff stated that it was filed by an individual in the intelligence community and determined by Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to be credible and a matter of “urgent concern. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
  Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State Entangled Legalities beyond the State pp i-i PDF HTML Select Global Law Series - Series page Global Law Series - Series page pp ii-ii PDF HTML Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page  pp iii-iii PDF HTML Select Copyright page Copyright page  pp iv-iv PDF HTML Select Contents Contents pp v-vii… [read post]