Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
For examples, see generally for blasphemy, U.S. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:52 am
(Louis Henkin, 'International Organization,' (1969) 23(3) The United States and International Organization: The Changing Setting, pp. 656-682, 657).International organizations provide what, for the generation active after 1945, provided the great nexus point of law and international organization. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
The court held that the AI-generated work is protectable by copyright law since it is as a work of legal entities.Eleonora Rosati discussed the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Response Clothing Ltd v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd case. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:15 pm
Progressive Dynamics, Inc., 194 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am
Some, most notably those who are either law nerds or untroubled by the substance, will raise the shock that a draft opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States was leaked to Politico. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
In other words, the Court faces a secondary question in its ATS analysis: does it wish to limit just federal ATS cases or does it wish to limit transnational human rights litigation in the United States generally where there is a limited nexus with the United States? [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
In State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
But this valve of healthy constitutional democracies is not discussed or theorized enough in the United States, for obvious practical reasons. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:59 pm
The exception has long been understood by some parties, including the United States, to be “self-judging,” meaning that the state invoking the exception has the exclusive competence to decide whether the exception applies. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:23 am
The buildings were valuable and General Dynamics stepped in and bought the complex for its submarine division. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
We commented on a similar dynamic under Federal Rule 21 here.California. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
