Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 61 - 80 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
Michael Flynn recently seemed to call for a military coup in the United States, Myanmar-style. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:15 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
A decision last week out of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by ASAD KHAN
The court approved of the point in the United Nations Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV)) (1970) that generally the widespread use of colonial clauses in international treaties reflects one of the “basic principles of international law” with the result: … that for… [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Dynamics, where the Commission had to give up on its argument that the Indiana control share acquisition statute was preempted by the Williams Act (the brief specifically stated that the United States did not believe that the Williams Act preempted the statute). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Dennis Crouch
  About twenty art units have been classified as generally dealing with “business method” patents. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
  National: General Dynamics to No Longer Contribute to Political Organizations Washington Business Journal – Jill Aitoro | Published: 4/22/2014 General Dynamics announced it will no longer make contributions to political organizations or nonprofit groups that in turn give to campaigns. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]